<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NSDesign Blog &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>interesting thoughts and other stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google Panda waging war with Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/04/is-google-panda-waging-war-with-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/04/is-google-panda-waging-war-with-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ciao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panda update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/?p=1158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s Panda update has sent shockwaves through the online industry and it seems that few are safe from its rampage – not even Microsoft. Ciao, the price comparison and reviews site run by Microsoft, has been pushed down the search rankings as a result of the new algorithm. It lost a massive 94% of its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/03/google-revamps-algorithm-to-beat-content-farms/" target="_blank">Google’s Panda update</a> has sent shockwaves through the online industry and it seems that few are safe from its rampage – not even Microsoft.<br />
Ciao, the price comparison and reviews site run by Microsoft, has been pushed down the <a href="http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/services/marketing">search rankings</a> as a result of the new algorithm. It lost a massive 94% of its <a href="http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/services/seo">SEO</a> visibility after the Panda update, which seeks to improve the quality of content that’s displayed in the search listings, went live last week.</p>
<p>Ciao is one of many comparison, review and voucher code websites to suffer at the hands of the Panda.</p>
<p>Industry insiders are suggesting that Google’s attack on Ciao will only serve to fuel the fierce rivalry between Google and Microsoft.<br />
Other sites to suffer a setback in the search rankings include Qype, which lost nearly 96% of its SEO visibility, and other notable sites such as Play.com, ehow.co.uk, hotfrog.co.uk and shoppingvouchers.co.uk.</p>
<p>Google as also reduced the visibility of sites that feature a large amount of advertising. There were some success stories in this week’s search rankings, however, with several sites celebrating a big rise in visibility. EBay.co.uk’s visibility increased by 42.1% whilst national-lottery.co.uk enjoyed a 39.5% rise. Other winners included econsultancy.com, this is money.co.uk and metro.co.uk.</p>
<p>Google designed its now infamous Panda update in order to push what it calls high-quality sites further up the search rankings whilst penalising those sites with unoriginal or repetitive content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/04/is-google-panda-waging-war-with-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flailing Yahoo! falls further behind Google</title>
		<link>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/01/flailing-yahoo-falls-further-behind-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/01/flailing-yahoo-falls-further-behind-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techno talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! is struggling to cope with surging competition from Google and Facebook, with the web portal and search engine facing the prospect of making 1% of its 14,100 workforce redundant &#8211; just shortly after announcing 4% cuts in which whole departments were laid off. Yahoo! was the subject of a failed take-over bid by Microsoft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! is struggling to cope with surging competition from Google and Facebook, with the web portal and <a href="http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/services/seo">search engine</a> facing the prospect of making 1% of its 14,100 workforce redundant &#8211; just shortly after announcing 4% cuts in which whole departments were laid off.</p>
<p>Yahoo! was the subject of a failed take-over bid by Microsoft in the third quarter of 2008, and gross revenues have failed to grow from that point. After Yahoo! announced its redundancy plans, the company&#8217;s shares fell 4.4% in after-hours trading.</p>
<p>eMarketer, the business information service which analyses US online advertising spending, understood that Yahoo!&#8217;s display advertising share decreased last year to 16.2% from 16.5% in 2009 while &#8211; in the same period &#8211; Facebook accounted for 13.6% of display revenues, an increase from 7.3% in 2009. Yahoo! chief-executive Carol Bartz admitted that the company was not getting the click revenue it had hoped for.</p>
<p>Yahoo!&#8217;s current cuts contrast to Google&#8217;s fortunes, as the corporation implements an assertive recruitment plan to hire 1,000 new employees in Europe. In the same quarter that Yahoo!&#8217;s revenue had decreased by 4%, Google&#8217;s revenue had grown 26% to $8.4bn and its profits by 29% to $2.5bn.</p>
<p>Referring to Google&#8217;s further fourth-quarter profits of $2.54bn, outgoing chief-executive Eric Schmidt said: &#8220;We had a very, very good year and a very strong quarter&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2011/01/flailing-yahoo-falls-further-behind-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSDesign Ltd for Sale&#8230;  (come and get us Microsoft)</title>
		<link>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2008/02/nsdesign-ltd-for-sale-come-and-get-us-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2008/02/nsdesign-ltd-for-sale-come-and-get-us-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techno talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsdesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2008/02/nsdesign-ltd-for-sale-come-and-get-us-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok &#8211; so we&#8217;re not actually for sale (before we get clients phoning in a panic), unless of course Microsoft wants to come in and offer $40 billion to aquire a thriving web design and consultancy company from Glasgow &#8211; the value they placed on Yahoo just last week, when they attempted to buy the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok &#8211; so we&#8217;re not actually for sale (before we get clients phoning in a panic), unless of course <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> wants to come in and offer $40 billion to aquire a thriving web design and consultancy company from Glasgow &#8211; the value they placed on <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> just last week, when they attempted to buy the web search company.</p>
<p>Their somewhat random offer was actually 62% above the &#8220;market value&#8221; of Yahoo, based on their share price at the time, a valuation most traditional businesses in the past would have jumped at.  But just how do you value a &#8220;Web Company&#8221;&#8230;  It&#8217;s certainly not an easy task, and (as MS have shown) not just down to the current stock market trends.</p>
<p> So&#8230; will we see a MSNahoo?  Or will (as many as speculating) <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> suddenly appear as a rival bidder.  And what will it all mean for us web users?  Less choice?  A better service?  Only time will tell&#8230;</p>
<p>Ps &#8211; I was only kidding about selling NSDesign for $40 billion&#8230;  I&#8217;d take less.. <img src='http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nsdesign.co.uk/blog/2008/02/nsdesign-ltd-for-sale-come-and-get-us-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

